Skyrim's visual upgrade is noticeable but by no means incredible, and many of its uglier elements-like its off-putting character models-persist. If you're booting up The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Special Edition expecting to be overwhelmed by transcendent visual splendor, you're much more likely to be disappointed than blown away. Whether you're slashing a dragon's wings, raising the dead back to life, or experimenting at the alchemy table, Skyrim performs the most spectacular of enchantments: the one that causes huge chunks of time to vanish before you know it." (GameSpot's The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Review) Revisiting Tamrielįor players who've already sunk 100 hours into Skyrim, are the remastered elements in the Special Edition reason enough to jump back in? Here's what GameSpot Editor, Scott Butterworth, has to say after six hours on PlayStation 4: It isn't just that there's a lot to do: it's that most of it is so good. In his 2011 review, Kevin VanOrd wrote: "The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim doesn't rely on sheer scope to earn its stripes. If you've always wanted to give Skyrim a try, there's no time like the present, but beware: it's easy to lose yourself in the game.
Platform parity aside, Skyrim Special Edition is a significantly improved console version of the now-classic game. With the new Special Edition release, console players are almost on equal footing now-the one exception being Bethesda is controlling which mods are available on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One. Skyrim was popular on consoles as well, but the Xbox 360 and PS3 ports were far and away inferior, with muddy visuals, diminished frame rates, and extended load times. The 2011 hit thrived on PC thanks to powerful hardware and a flood of user-created mods. Remasters are commonplace at this stage, but when a game as beloved as Skyrim is revamped, people take notice.
0 kommentar(er)
